Neuerscheinungen 2016Stand: 2020-02-01 |
Schnellsuche
ISBN/Stichwort/Autor
|
Herderstraße 10 10625 Berlin Tel.: 030 315 714 16 Fax 030 315 714 14 info@buchspektrum.de |
Lior Nitzan
Jacob Sigismund Beckīs Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate
The Relation Between a Representation and its Object
Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2014. 2016. xiii, 398 S. 1 SW-Abb. 235 mm
Verlag/Jahr: SPRINGER, BERLIN; SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING 2016
ISBN: 3-319-34758-6 (3319347586)
Neue ISBN: 978-3-319-34758-5 (9783319347585)
Preis und Lieferzeit: Bitte klicken
This book examines the unique views of philosopher Jacob Sigismund Beck, a student of Immanuel Kant who devoted himself to an exploration of his teacherīs doctrine and to showing that Kantīs transcendental idealism is, contra to the common view, both internally consistent and is not a form of subjective idealism. In his attempt to explain away certain apparent contradictions found in Kantīs system, Beck put forward a new reading of Kantīs critical theory, a view, which came to be known as the Standpunctslehre, the Doctrine of the Standpoint.
Author Lior Nitzan reconstructs, step by step, the historical development of Beckīs doctrine. He shows how Beckīs unique view is drastically different from that of his contemporaries and presents the relevance of Beck to contemporary debates about the proper interpretation of Kantīs notion of objectivity, the refutation of idealism and the role of the thing in itself in Kantīs transcendental idealism. In doing so, Nitzan presents a defense of Beckīs radical perspective of Kantīs theory and claims that some of Kantīs negative responses to it may in fact be due more to the adversary academic environment at the time than to Kantīs true, well considered, opinion.
Jacob Sigismund Beckīs Standpunctslehre challenges the two dominant schools in the interpretation of Kantīs transcendental idealism-the "two world" and the "two aspect" view. It presents a new way of understanding Kantīs transcendental idealism, according to which the thing in itself plays no positive role in relation to the possibility of experience. Moreover, it claims that eliminating the thing in itself as the ultimate object of knowledge is not to admit idealism but in fact is the only way to consistently uphold realism. In addition, the book also addresses the question why, assuming that the proposed interpretation is correct, Kant had chosen not to make his true intentions clear.
Part I.- 1.Introduction.- Part II - Kantīs transcendental idealism and the notion of the thing-in-itself.- 2. The subjective conditions of objectivity.- 3. The seemingly inevitable roles of the thing-in-itself.- Part III - Jacob Sigismund Beckīs Standpunctslehre.- 4. The development of Beckīs thought, leading up to the publication of the einzig möglicher Standpunct.- 5. The problem of the bond between a representation and its object.- 6. The requisiteness of resolving the problem of the bond between a representation and its object, for making intelligible the critiqueīs main concepts and distinctions.- 7. The highest principle of philosophy - the postulate to represent originally.- 8. Original representing and the categories.- 9. Synthetic and analytic unity of consciousness.- 10. Original representing and practical philosophy.- Part IV - Beckīs Standpunctslehre in relation to Kantīs original doctrine.- 11. The relation between sensibility and the understanding.- 12. The relation between a representation and its object.- 13. The thing-in-itself and practical philosophy.- Part V.- 14. Epilogue.- A short biography of J. S. Beck.- Index.
The author has obtained a Bachelor degree in Law (LL.B) from the College of Management in Tel-Aviv, Israel in 1998 and a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Haifa, Israel, in 2012. He received the Rotenstreich Fellowship for exceptional Doctoral students. With the support of the Minerva Fellowship, the author has been a guest of the Department of Philosophy at the Humboldt University in Berlin between 2010-2011. He published several articles relating to the interpretation of Kantīs Transcendental Idealism and is currently working on the Neo-Kantian debate in Germany during the 19th century between psychologism and normativism.